| Punjab National Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 'CRISIL AA/Stable' assigned to Tier I Bonds (Under Basel III) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rating Action | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| & Originally issued and now transferred from United Bank of India% Originally issued and now transferred from United Bank of India^ Originally issued and now transferred from United Bank of India$ Transferred from Oriental Bank of Commerce | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Note: None of the Directors on CRISIL Ratings Limited’s Board are members of rating committee and thus do not participate in discussion or assignment of any ratings. The Board of Directors also does not discuss any ratings at its meetings. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 crore = 10 million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refer to Annexure for Details of Instruments & Bank Facilities |
Detailed Rationale CRISIL Ratings has assigned its ‘CRISIL AA/Stable’ rating to Rs.2000 crore Tier I Bonds (under Basel III) of Punjab National Bank (PNB) and reaffirmed its ‘CRISIL AA+/CRISIL AA/Stable/CRISIL A1+’ ratings on the Tier II Bonds (under Basel III), Lower Tier II Bonds (Under Basel II), Perpetual Tier I Bonds (Under Basel II), Tier I Bonds (Under Basel III), Infrastructure Bonds and Certificate of Deposits.
CRISIL Ratings has also withdrawn its rating on Lower tier II bonds (Under Basel II) Rs 200 crore and Upper Tier-II Bonds (under Basel II) Rs 3110 crore (See Annexure 'Details of Rating Withdrawn' for details) in line with its withdrawal policy. CRISIL Ratings has received independent confirmation that this instrument is fully redeemed.
The outstanding ratings on the debt instruments of PNB continue to factor in the expectation of strong support from the majority owner, Government of India (GoI), established market position and the bank’s healthy resource profile. The ratings also factor in the modest asset quality and profitability metrics.
The rating of Tier I bonds (under Basel III) factors in position of PNB to make future coupon payments, supported by an adjustment of accumulated losses with share premium account, and the improved capital ratios. Pursuant to the adjustment, the eligible reserve to total assets ratio for the bank has improved. CRISIL has also taken into consideration, Department of Financial Services Gazette notification no. CG-DL-E-23032020-218862 (S.O. 1200 E) dated 23.03.2020 referred to as Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Amendment Scheme, 2020, which specifies that share premium reserves can be utilised to set off any losses in future. PNB has significant share premium reserves which can be utilised in the future, if required, thereby protecting from any depletion in eligible reserves. This supports the credit profile of Tier I (under Basel III) instruments. CRISIL Ratings also notes precedents whereby many banks have initiated the process of setting off losses with share premium reserves successfully. However, any substantial depletion of the share premium account or any regulatory changes to appropriation of the share premium account pertaining to adjustment of accumulated losses are key monitorables.
The rating on the Tier I bonds (under Basel III) meets 'CRISIL's rating criteria for BASEL III-compliant instruments of banks'. CRISIL Ratings evaluates the bank's (i) reserves position (adjusted for any medium-term stress in profitability) and (ii) cushion over regulatory minimum CET1 (including CCB) capital ratios. Also evaluated is the demonstrated track record and management philosophy regarding maintenance of sufficient CET1 capital cushion above the minimum regulatory requirements.
The distinguishing features of non-equity tier I capital instruments (under Basel III) are the existence of coupon discretion at all times, high capital thresholds for likely coupon non-payment, and principal write-down (on breach of a pre-specified trigger). These features increase the risk attributes of non-equity tier I instruments over those of tier II instruments under Basel III, and capital instruments under Basel II. To factor in these risks, CRISIL Ratings notches down the rating on these instruments from the bank's corporate credit rating.
The factors that could trigger a default event for non-equity tier I capital instruments (under Basel III), resulting in non-payment of coupon, are: i) the bank exercising coupon discretion; ii) inadequacy of eligible reserves to honour coupon payment if the bank reports a loss or low profit; or iii) the bank breaching the minimum regulatory Common Equity Tier I (CET I; including the Capital Conservation Buffer) ratio. Moreover, given the additional risk attributes, the rating transition for non-equity tier I capital instruments (under Basel III) can potentially be higher and faster than that for tier II instruments. |
Analytical Approach For arriving at the ratings, CRISIL Ratings has factored in the support the bank is expected to receive from GoI. This is because GoI is both the majority shareholder in PSBs and the guardian of India's financial system. The stability of the banking sector is of prime importance to GoI, given the criticality of the sector to the economy, the strong public perception of government backing for PSBs, and the severe implications of any PSB failure in terms of political fallout, systemic stability, and investor confidence in public sector institutions.
Please refer Annexure - List of entities consolidated, which captures the list of entities considered and their analytical treatment of consolidation. |
Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description Strengths:
The ratings continue to factor in the expectation of strong government support, both on an ongoing basis and in the event of any distress. This is because GoI is both the majority shareholder in PSBs, and the guardian of India's financial system. Stability of the banking sector is of prime importance to GoI, given the criticality of the sector to the economy, strong public perception of sovereign backing for PSBs, and severe implications of any PSB failure, in terms of political fallout, systemic stability, and investor confidence in public sector institutions. CRISIL believes the majority ownership creates a moral obligation on GoI to support PSBs, including PNB. As part of the ‘Indradhanush’ framework, the government had pledged to infuse at least Rs 70,000 crore in PSBs,over fiscals 2015 to 2019, of which Rs 25,000 crore was infused in both fiscals 2016 and 2017. Further, in October 2017, the government had outlined a recapitalisation package of Rs 2.11 lakh crore over fiscals 2018 and 2019; PNB, erstwhile Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) and erstwhile United Bank of India (UBI) received aggregate Rs 11,678 crore in fiscal 2018 and Rs 25,839 crore in fiscal 2019. Also, on August 30, 2019, GoI announced its plan to merge 10 PSBs into four along with its plan for first round of capital infusion of Rs 55,250 crore for fiscal 2020 out of which PNB and erstwhile UBI received Rs 16,091 crore and Rs 1,666 crore respectively. Thus, over the past three fiscals, GoI infused around Rs 55,724 crore into the combined entity. For the first half of fiscal 2022, the bank raised Rs 1800 crore via QIP. CRISIL believes that GoI will continue to provide distress support to all PSBs and will not allow any of them to fail; it will also support them to meet Basel III capital regulations.
PNB has a strong presence and it has increased its market share to ~6.6% of the system’s advances as on March 31, 2022. It has become the second largest public sector bank in India. As on March 31, 2022, PNB’s total business stood at Rs 19,31,323 crore with advances and deposits at Rs 7,85,104 crore and Rs 11,46,219 crore respectively. Bank’s pan-India presence has also improved through a network of 10,098 branches as on March 31, 2022. The Bank also has increased its share of retail, agriculture and MSME advances to 49.5% as on March 31, 2022.
The resource profile of the bank remains healthy. The bank had a large and geographically diversified deposit base of Rs 11,46,218 crore as on March 31,2022 (Rs 11,06,332 crore as on March 31, 2021). The domestic CASA ratio was relatively steady at 47.43% as on March 31, 2022 (45.48% as on March 31, 2021). Moreover, around 85% of total deposits as on March 31, 2022 comprised of retail term deposits and savings deposits (~85% as on September 30, 2021). The cost of deposit stood at 3.90% for fiscal 2022. Overall, CRISIL believes that the bank will maintain a healthy resource profile over the medium term.
Weaknesses:
Asset quality for the bank remains modest. GNPA of the bank stood at 11.78% as on March 31, 2022 (as compared to 14.12% as on March 31, 2021). Slippage as a percentage of opening net advances remained high at 3.9% (annualised) for fiscal 2022. The slippages primarily stemmed from the Agri, Retail and MSME portfolio for the bank. However, slippages from the large corporate accounts are expected to be lower in the medium term as significant part of the stress has already been recognised; however, performance of the mid-corporate, SME and retail segments are key monitorables. Under the RBI’s resolution framework 1.0 and RBI’s resolution framework 2.0 announced by the RBI, PNB has restructured 2.2% of gross advances as on March 31,2022. Bank has also disbursed 2.3% of gross advances to MSME segment under the ECLGS scheme. Nevertheless, the ability of the bank to manage collections and asset quality going forward this fiscal, is a key monitorable.
Primarily as a result of the elevated asset quality metrics, PNB’s earnings profile has been constrained over the last few years because of high provisioning costs. The Bank has steadily increased its overall provisioning and the provision coverage ratio (PCR) excluding technical write-off stands at 62.24% as on March 31, 2022. The Bank has also provided aggressively for all NCLT accounts with PCR at 97.52%. With the aggressive provisioning done in the past, the bank reported a profit of Rs 3457 crore (against a profit of Rs 2022 crore for fiscal 2021) translating into a ROA of 0.27%. (0.16% as on March 31, 2021). The performance of the restructured portfolio weigh on the profitability metrics and hence remains a key monitorable. |
Liquidity: Strong Liquidity is comfortable, supported by a strong retail deposit base. Liquidity coverage ratio (based on simple average for daily observations) stood at 184% as on March 31, 2022, against the regulatory requirement of 100%. The bank also has access to systemic sources of funds, such as the liquidity adjustment facility from Reserve Bank of India, access to the call money market, and refinance limits from sources such as the National Housing Bank and the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. |
Outlook: Stable CRISIL Ratings believes that PNB will continue to benefit from strong GoI support and maintain its healthy market position and resource profile over the medium term. The Bank's asset quality and earnings profile is expected to remain modest but not deteriorate significantly from current levels. |
Rating Sensitivity factors Upward factors:
Downward factors:
|
About the Company PNB, established in 1895 in Lahore, Pakistan, expanded its operations through mergers and acquisitions before being nationalised in 1969. On March 4, 2020, the Union Cabinet approved the amalgamation of PNB, UBI and OBC. The Board of Directors of the bank finalised the share exchange ratio on March 5, 2020, and the merger got effective from April 1, 2020. The GoI owned 73.15% of the bank as on March 31, 2022. As on March 31, 2022, Bank’s CET 1, Tier I and Overall CAR for the bank stood at 10.56%, 11.73% and 14.50%, respectively, compared to 10.62%, 11.50% and 14.32%, respectively, as on March 31,2021.
For fiscal 2022, PNB reported a net profit of Rs 3,457 crore on total income (net of interest expenses) of Rs 41,014 crore as against net profit of Rs 2,022 crore (including UBI and OBC) on total income (net of interest expenses) of Rs 42,468 crore, respectively, in corresponding period of previous year. |
Key Financial Indicators
|
Any other information: Not Applicable
Note on Tier-I Instruments (under Basel III) The distinguishing features of non-equity Tier-I capital instruments (under Basel III) are the existence of coupon discretion at all times, high capital thresholds for likely coupon non-payment, and principal write-down (on breach of a pre-specified trigger). These features increase risk attributes of non-equity Tier-I instruments over those of Tier-II instruments under Basel III, and capital instruments under Basel II. To factor in these risks, CRISIL notches down the rating on these instruments from the bank's corporate credit rating. The rating on PNB’s Tier-I bonds (under Basel III) has, therefore, been lowered by two notches from its corporate credit rating to 'CRISIL AA-, in line with CRISIL's criteria (refer to 'CRISIL's rating criteria for BASEL III compliant instruments of banks').
CRISIL's rating on the Tier I bonds (under Basel III) of PNB is as per the criteria 'CRISIL's rating criteria for BASEL III-compliant instruments of banks'. CRISIL evaluates the bank's (i) reserves position (adjusted for any medium-term stress in profitability) and (ii) cushion over regulatory minimum CET1 (including CCB) capital ratios. Also evaluated is the demonstrated track record and management philosophy regarding maintaining sufficient CET1 capital cushion above the minimum regulatory requirements. Post the completion of the merger with OBC and UBI, the merged PNB reported huge losses. Subsequently, on August 4, 2020, the bank has taken shareholder approval for utilisation of share premium account for the purpose of setting off accumulated losses. This has supported the eligible reserves which post the adjustment stood at around Rs 26515 crores as on June 30, 2020. Consequently, the eligible reserves to total asset ratio was adequateat 2.2%. A material reduction in this cushion would be a rating sensitivity factor for Tier I bonds.
Note on Tier-II Instruments (under Basel III) The distinguishing feature of Tier-II capital instruments under Basel II, is the existence of the point of non-viability (PONV) trigger, occurrence of which may result in loss of principal to the investors, and hence, to default on the instrument by the issuer. According to the Basel III guidelines, the PONV trigger will be determined by the RBI. CRISIL believes that the PONV trigger is a remote possibility in the Indian context, given the robust regulatory and supervisory framework and the systemic importance of the banking sector. The inherent risk associated with the PONV feature is adequately factored into the rating on the instrument.
Note on Hybrid Instruments (under Basel II) Given that hybrid capital instruments (tier-I perpetual bonds and upper tier-II bonds; under Basel II) have characteristics that set them apart from lower tier-II bonds (under Basel II), the ratings on the two instruments may not necessarily be identical. The factors that could trigger a default event for hybrid instruments include: the bank breaching the regulatory minimum capital requirement, or the regulator’s denial of permission to the bank to make payments of interest and principal if the bank reports losses. Hence, the transition from one rating category to another may be significantly sharper for these instruments than in the case of Lower Tier-II bonds; this is because debt servicing on hybrid instruments is far more sensitive to the bank’s overall capital adequacy levels and profitability |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument: |
Annexure - Details of Instrument(s)
*details awaited ^yet to be issued
Annexure - Details of Rating Withdrawn
|
Annexure – List of entities consolidated
|
| Annexure - Rating History for last 3 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All amounts are in Rs.Cr. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria Details
|